[1]赵千菁,贾 琦*.“人伦日用”内涵下的明代男子巾类造型艺术[J].服装学报,2020,5(03):263-269.
　ZHAO Qianjing,JIA Qi*.Plastic Arts of Men’s Towels in Ming Dynasty under the Connotation of "Human Relations and Daily Use"[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2020,5(03):263-269.
点击复制

“人伦日用”内涵下的明代男子巾类造型艺术()
分享到：

《服装学报》[ISSN:2096-1928/CN:32-1864/TS]

卷:
第5卷
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
263-269
栏目:
服装服饰文化
出版日期:
2020-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Plastic Arts of Men’s Towels in Ming Dynasty under the Connotation of "Human Relations and Daily Use"
作者:
赵千菁;  贾 琦*
武汉纺织大学 服装学院,湖北 武汉 430074
Author(s):
ZHAO Qianjing;  JIA Qi*
School of Fashion,Wuhan Textile University,Wuhan 430074,China
分类号:
J 523.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过文献资料和传世画作相结合的研究方法,将明代男子巾类造型进行类型化分析,释读出其均衡和谐、简炼整洁的基本特征,探究不同造型在“人伦日用”内涵下的重复性造物思维和具体表现、有序与失序的等级格局等特征。由此得出,明代男子巾类造型艺术不仅涉及造物伦理,还与明代佩戴者的阶级身份、文化习性等因素有关。
Abstract:
Through the combination of literature materials and paintings, the shapes of male towels in the Ming Dynasty was typed and analyzed, and the basic features of its balance, harmony, conciseness and neatness were interpreted. The characteristics of repetitive creative thinking and concrete expression, the ordered and disordered hierarchical patterns of different their shapes were explored under the connotation of "human relations and daily use". It is concluded that the man’s towel shaping art in the Ming Dynasty not only involved the creation ethics, but also related to the identity class and cultural habits of the wearer in the Ming Dynasty.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱贻庭.伦理学大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2002:366.
[2] 王易,张泽硕.中国传统德育中的“人伦日用”及其当代启示[J].伦理学研究,2015(5):45-51.
WANG Yi, ZHANG Zeshuo. The daily use of Human relations in Chinese traditional moral education and its contemporary enlightenment[J]. Ethical Studies,2015(5):45-51.(in Chinese)
[3] 中国社会科学院考古研究所.定陵:下[M].北京:文物出版社,1990:139.
[4] 沈从文.中国古代服饰研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011:649-653.
[5] 司美茵,戴鸿文,戴立强.追述祖先的身影——美国赛克勒艺术馆藏中国影像初探[J].文物世界,2002(2):42- 46.
SI Meiyin,DAI Hongwen,DAI Liqiang. Tracing back to the figure of ancestors: a preliminary study on the Collection of Chinese Images at the Sickler Museum of Art in the United States[J]. World of Cultural Relics,2002(2):42- 46.(in Chinese)
[6] 刘大伟.形态构成:平面[M].沈阳:辽宁美术出版社,2014:88.
[7] 郑奇.古代名画赏析[M].北京:荣宝斋出版社,2010:34.
[8] 曹利祥.中国美术图典:肖像画[M].广州:岭南美术出版社,2000:56.
[9] 赫勒.日常生活[M].衣俊卿,译.重庆:重庆出版社,1990:138.
[10] 赵屹.造物行为的伦理内涵[J]. 南京艺术学院学报(美术及设计版),2001(1):80-85.
ZHAO Yi. The ethical connotation of creative behavior[J]. Journal of Nanjing Academy of Arts(Art and Design Edition),2001(1): 80-85.(in Chinese)
[11] 明实录:太祖实录[M].中央研究院历史语言研究所,校.台北:中央研究院语言研究所,1962:525.
[12] 周汛,高春明.中国衣冠服饰大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1996:99-113.
[13] 张贞.“日常生活”与中国大众文化研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2008:151.
[14] 高春明.中国服饰名物考[M].上海:上海文化出版社,2001:262.
[15] 高春明.中国历代服饰艺术[M].北京:中国青年出版社,2009:68.
[16] 刘建平.中国美术全集:元代绘画[M].天津:天津人民美术出版社,1997:28.
[17] 沈德符.万历野获编[M].北京:中华书局,1959:663.
[18] 王圻,王思义.三才图会·衣服:卷一[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988:11-12.
[19] 朱承.论中国式“生活政治”[J].探索与争鸣,2014(10):90-93.
ZHU Cheng. On Chinese style "life politics"[J]. Exploration and Contending,2014(10):90- 93.(in Chinese)
[20] 林丽月.明代禁奢令新探[C]//张中正.第五届明史国际学术讨论会明史论文集.安徽:黄山书社,1993:8.
[21] 佚名.天一阁藏明代方志选刊 19册——万历新昌县志:卷四[M].上海:上海古籍书店,1981:5.
[22] 赵锦修,张衮纂.嘉靖江阴县志[M]. 刘徐昌,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2011:83.
[23] 佚名.万历重修泉州府志:卷三[M]. 阳思谦,修.徐敏学,吴维新,纂.台北:学生书局,1987:293-294.(责任编辑:卢 杰)

相似文献/References:

[1]牛 犁,崔 艺.京杭大运河流域明代服饰研究综述[J].服装学报,2021,6(03):228.
　NIU Li,CUI Yi.Research Review of Ming Dynasty Costume in the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal Valley[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2021,6(03):228.
[2]徐小盼,王 蕾*.明代道袍的结构分析与复原[J].服装学报,2023,8(05):384.
　XU Xiaopan,WANG Lei*.Structural Analysis and Restoration of Taoist Robes in Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2023,8(03):384.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-30