[1]常晓君,王楚昀.明代贴里与曳撒形制异同考[J].服装学报,2022,7(06):506-513.
　CHANG Xiaojun,WANG Chuyun.Similarities and Differences Between Tieli and Yisan in Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2022,7(06):506-513.
点击复制

明代贴里与曳撒形制异同考()
分享到：

《服装学报》[ISSN:2096-1928/CN:32-1864/TS]

卷:
第7卷
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
506-513
栏目:
服装历史与文化
出版日期:
2022-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Similarities and Differences Between Tieli and Yisan in Ming Dynasty
作者:
常晓君;  王楚昀
太原师范学院 艺术学理论研究中心,山西 晋中 030619
Author(s):
CHANG Xiaojun;  WANG Chuyun
Art Theory Research Center, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, China
分类号:
TS 941.12; K 876.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对明代男子服饰中常见的贴里与曳撒服装形制易混淆、不明确的问题,通过对相关文献的疏理以及对贴里、曳撒文物的分析,从服装裁剪、衣褶样式以及着装习惯角度,对明代贴里、曳撒的形制进行梳理并加以区分。总结得出,贴里的穿着人群具有跨阶级性,与曳撒的“贵族制式”不同; 且贴里的裁剪缝合形式为前后、上下分裁,褶形主要有顺褶、平褶两类,合围或单侧开衩下摆,无曳撒之缯角。研究表明:明代常见男子服饰中的贴里和曳撒虽具有类似起源,但在服装样式与着装制度方面均有差异,贴里在形制层面更贴近蒙元传统,而曳撒则为蒙元文化与汉族传统文化融合的产物。
Abstract:
In view of the confusion and ambiguity of the common forms of tieli and yisan in men’s costume in Ming Dynasty, this paper combed and distinguished the forms of tieli and yisan in Ming Dynasty from the perspective of costume cutting, pleat styles and dress habits by examining the relevant literature and analyzing the cultural relics of tieli and yisan. The conclusion is that the people wearing tieli have a cross-class nature, which is different from the "aristocratic system" of yisan. Moreover, the cutting and sewing form of tieli is front-back, up-down cutting, and the pleats are mainly of two types: straight pleats and flat pleats, with hemming or one-sided slit hem, without yisan’s corners. The research shows that although the tieli and yisan of common men’s costume in Ming Dynasty have similar origins,but their costume styles and dress regimes are different. Tieli is closer to the Mongolian and Yuan traditions in shape, while yisan is the fusion product of Mongolian and Yuan cultures and Han traditional cultures.

参考文献/References:

[1] 宋春会.明代曳撒的形制考释[J]. 装饰, 2021(4): 132-133.
SONG Chunhui. Interpretation of shape differentiation of yesa robe in Ming Dynasty[J]. Art and Design, 2021(4): 132-133.(in Chinese)
[2] 宋濂.元史[M].北京:中华书局,1976.
[3] 刘贯道.元世祖出猎图[EB/OL].[2022-04-01].https://www.ltfc.net/img/60213b41a7e6427598891f81.
[4] 王圻,王思义.三才图会[M].影印本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1988.
[5] 潘晓暾.吉林省博物院藏《元人相马图》赏析[J].文物天地,2021(2):75-77.
PAN Xiaotun. Appreciation and analysis on The Painting of Yuan People Observing Horses in the Jilin Provincial Museum [J].Cultural Relics World, 2021(2): 75-77.(in Chinese)
[6] 李莉莎. “质孙”对明代服饰的影响[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 42(4): 11-16.
LI Lisha. The influence of “zhisun” on garments in Ming Dynasty[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philo-sophy and Social Sciences), 2010, 42(4): 11-16.(in Chinese)
[7] 张廷玉.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[8] 山东省博物馆. 发掘明朱檀墓纪实[J]. 文物, 1972(5): 25-36, 67.
Shandong Museum.On-the-spot excavation of ZHU Tan Tomb in Ming Dynasty[J].Cultural Relics, 1972(5): 25-36, 67.(in Chinese)
[9] 山东博物馆, 山东省文物考古研究所. 鲁荒王墓[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014.
[10] 邵磊, 骆鹏. 明宪宗孝贞皇后王氏家族墓的考古发现与初步研究[J]. 东南文化, 2013(5): 68-84.
SHAO Lei, LUO Peng. Archaeological discoveries and initiative research on the Wang family tombs of Empress Xiaozhen, wife to Emperor Xianzong of the Ming Dynasty[J]. Southeast Culture, 2013(5): 68-84.(in Chinese)
[11] 王秀玲. 明定陵出土帝后服饰(二)[J]. 收藏家, 2009(10): 9-17.
WANG Xiuling. Raiment of emperor and empress from Dingling Mausoleum(Ⅱ)[J]. Collectors, 2009(10): 9-17.(in Chinese)
[12] 荆州地区博物馆,石首市博物馆.湖北石首市杨溥墓[J].江汉考古,1997(3):45-51.
Jingzhou Regional Museum, Shishou Museum. YANG Pu Tomb in Shishou City, Hubei Province[J].Jianghan Archaeology, 1997(3): 45-51.(in Chinese)
[13] 袁俊卿, 阮国林. 明徐达五世孙徐俌夫妇墓[J]. 文物, 1982(2): 28-33, 99.
YUAN Junqing, RUAN Guolin. Tomb of XU Kui and his wife,the fifth grandson of XU Da in Ming Dynasty[J].Cultural Relics, 1982(2): 28-33, 99.(in Chinese)
[14] 北京市文物工作队. 北京南苑苇子坑明代墓葬清理简报[J]. 文物, 1964(11): 45- 47, 60.
Beijing Cultural Relics Work Team.Brief report on the clearing of Ming Dynasty tombs in Weizikeng, Nanyuan, Beijing[J].Cultural Relics, 1964(11): 45- 47, 60.(in Chinese)
[15] 德安县博物馆. 江西德安明代熊氏墓清理简报[J]. 南方文物, 1994(4): 5-9.
De’an County Museum.Brief report on the cleaning of Xiong family tombs in Ming Dynasty in De’an, Jiangxi[J].Relics Form South, 1994(4): 5-9.(in Chinese)
[16] 叶定一. 江苏泰州明代刘湘夫妇合葬墓清理简报[J]. 文物, 1992(8): 66-77, 103.
YE Dingyi. Brief report on the cleaning of LIU Xiang and his wife’s tomb in Ming Dynasty in Taizhou,Jiangsu[J].Cultural Relics, 1992(8): 66-77, 103.(in Chinese)
[17] 周汛,高春明.中国衣冠服饰大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1996.
[18] 故宫博物院.明人朱瞻基行乐图卷[EB/OL].[2022-04-01].https://www.dpm.org.cn/collection/paint/228988.html.
[19] 中国国家博物馆.《宪宗元宵行乐图》卷[EB/OL].[2022-04-01].https://www.chnmuseum.cn/zp/zpml/csp/202012/t20201217_248556.shtml.
[20] 太康县志编纂委员会.太康县志[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1991.
[21] 方以智.通雅[M].台北:中国台湾商务印书馆,1969.
[22] 山东博物馆.衣冠大成:明代服饰文化展[EB/OL].[2022-04-01].http://www.sdmuseum.com/Uploads/sdbwgshuzizhanting / specialmingfu / home.html?ivk_sa=1024320u.
[23] 白岚玲. 中国古代服饰变迁的文化折射[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(10): 110-112.
BAI Lanling. Cultural refraction of ancient Chinese costume changes[J]. People’s Tribune, 2021(10): 110-112.(in Chinese)
[24] 余永麟.北窗琐语[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[25] 王文锦.礼记译解[M].北京:中华书局,2001.
[26] 陈彤彤. 现代蒙古族服饰元素探源与演变下的创新设计研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2020.
[27] 张国伟. 元代半臂的形制与渊源[J]. 内蒙古大学艺术学院学报, 2013, 10(1): 53- 63.
ZHANG Guowei. The shape and structure and origins of the half arm in Yuan Dynasty[J]. Journal of Art College of Inner Mongolia University, 2013, 10(1): 53- 63.(in Chinese)
[28] 刘若愚.酌中志[M].成都:巴蜀出版社,1993.
[29] 崔莎莎, 胡晓东. 孔府旧藏明代男子服饰结构选例分析[J]. 服饰导刊, 2016, 5(1): 61- 67.
CUI Shasha, HU Xiaodong.Analysis of selected examples of men’s costume structure in Ming Dynasty in the old collection of Confucius[J].Fashion Guide, 2016, 5(1): 61- 67.(in Chinese)
(责任编辑:沈天琦)

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-30