[1]贾玺增,杨蝉溪.北京大学藏秦简《制衣》“襲”字考[J].服装学报,2024,9(01):54-64.
 JIA Xizeng,YANG Chanxi.Study on the Character "Xi" in Making Clothes on the Qin Bamboo Slips Housed at Peking University[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2024,9(01):54-64.
点击复制

北京大学藏秦简《制衣》“襲”字考()
分享到:

《服装学报》[ISSN:2096-1928/CN:32-1864/TS]

卷:
第9卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
54-64
栏目:
服饰文化
出版日期:
2024-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Character "Xi" in Making Clothes on the Qin Bamboo Slips Housed at Peking University
作者:
贾玺增1;  杨蝉溪2
1.清华大学 美术学院,北京 100084; 2.延世大学 未来教育院,韩国 首尔 03722
Author(s):
JIA Xizeng1;  YANG Chanxi2
1.Academy of Arts and Design,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China; 2.Future Education Institute, Yonsei University,Seoul 03722,Korea
分类号:
TS 941.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
北京大学藏秦代简牍《制衣》记载了秦代“襲”衣的尺寸和制法,其“襲”字的含义在古代服饰与“三礼”研究中具备特殊性,厘清“襲”字释义并对“襲”的使用价值作出判断具备必要性。梳理历代典籍文献及学者对“襲”的注释训解,并与同时期汉墓遣策记载相比较,得出以下结论:秦汉时期,“襲”在服饰名称、穿戴动作及礼仪方面有规范的用法; 《制衣》中“襲”为无下裙拼接的短款上衣,结合遣策、文献典籍记载,证明其为真实存在的; “襲”衣的形制、用途、使用人群在秦代、西汉初期至西汉中晚期经历了快速变化; “襲”字在“裼襲礼”中的使用有吉丧之分,结合遣策推测,在丧礼中“襲”衣为地方官府所赠裞衣,用以抚恤已故之人。
Abstract:
The text entitled Making Clothes on the Qin bamboo slips housed at Peking University, records the sizes and cutting techniques for making“xi”clothes in the Qin Dynasty. The character "xi" carries special significance in the study of ancient costumes and the "three rites". Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the meaning of the character and assess the value of its usage. This paper sorted out ancient literature and scholars’ annotations and interpretations of " xi " and compared them with the features recorded in tomb inventories of Han Dynasty in the same period. The following conclusions can be drawn: the character " xi " has a relatively standardized connotation and usage for clothes, wearing-related actions, and rituals in the Qin and Han Dynasties. In the context of Making Clothes, " xi " refers to a short top without a lower skirt, which is proved by real objects found in the tomb inventories and mentioned in ancient literature. As a noun for clothing, the form, usage and users of "xi” underwent rapid changes from the Qin Dynasty and the early stages of the Western Han Dynasty to the middle and late stages of the Western Han Dynasty. "Xi " was used both in sacrificial rites and obsequies. According to the tomb inventories, " xi " clothes recorded in the tomb inventories may refer to pensions distributed by local officials.

参考文献/References:

[1] 常怀颖, 王恺, 张琼, 等. 北京大学藏秦简牍室内发掘清理简报[J]. 文物, 2012(6): 32- 44, 1.
CHANG Huaiying, WANG Kai, ZHANG Qiong,et al.New discoveries among bamboo and wood slips of the Qin Dynasty collected by Peking University[J]. Cultural Relics, 2012(6): 32- 44, 1.(in Chinese)
[2] 朱凤瀚,韩巍,陈侃理.北京大学藏秦简牍概述[J].文物, 2012(6): 65-73, 1.
ZHU Fenghan,HAN Wei,CHEN Kanli. A general survey of the bamboo and wood slips of the Qin Dynasty collected by Peking University[J]. Cultural Relics, 2012(6): 65-73, 1.(in Chinese)
[3] 刘丽. 北大藏秦简《制衣》简介[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 52(2): 43- 48.
LIU Li. A brief introduction to Making Clothes on the Qin bamboo slips collected by Peking University[J]. Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2015, 52(2): 43- 48.(in Chinese)
[4] 刘丽.北大藏秦简《制衣》释文注释[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 54(5): 57- 62.
LIU Li. Notes on the interpretation of the Qin bamboo slips Making Clothes in the collection of Peking University[J]. Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2017, 54(5): 57- 62.(in Chinese)
[5] 彭浩,张玲.北京大学藏秦代简牍《制衣》的“裙”与“袴”[J].文物, 2016(9): 73-87, 1.
PENG Hao, ZHANG Ling. On "qun" and "ku" in Making Clothes of the Qin Dynasty bamboo slips in the collection of Peking university[J]. Cultural Relics, 2016(9): 73-87, 1.(in Chinese)
[6] 陈果,刘瑞璞.秦简交窬裁剪算法与藏袍古制结构[J].纺织学报, 2017, 38(4): 109-114.
CHEN Guo, LIU Ruipu. Jiaoyu cutting algorithm in Qin bamboo slips and traditional cutting technique in Tibetan robes[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017, 38(4): 109-114.(in Chinese)
[7] 王煊. 北大藏秦简《制衣》所见上衣服类相关问题探讨[J]. 南方文物, 2020(4): 217-226, 200.
WANG Xuan. Discussion on the related problems of upper garments seen in the Qin bamboo slips Making Clothes of Peking University collection[J]. Cultural Relics in Southern China, 2020(4): 217-226, 200.(in Chinese)
[8] 张智慧. “袭” 字字义探析[J]. 佳木斯职业学院学报, 2019(2): 203, 205.
ZHANG Zhihui. A probe into the meaning of the character "xi"[J]. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational Institute, 2019(2): 203, 205.(in Chinese)
[9] 王亚妮. 浅析“袭” 的词义演变[J]. 今古文创, 2022(29): 114-116.
WANG Yani. On the evolution of the meaning of "xi" [J]. JinGu Creative Literature, 2022(29): 114-116.(in Chinese)
[10] 郝铭鉴.“袭”字的理据和逻辑[J].咬文嚼字,2019(8):10-11.
HAO Mingjian. The rationale and logic of the word "xi"[J]. Biting Words and Chewing Characters,2019(8):10-11.(in Chinese)
[11] 郭冬霞. 汉代随葬服饰研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2018:76-78.
[12] 金玉. 魏晋十六国时期河西服饰资料整理与研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2021:13-15.
[13] 田天.从“衣物简”到衣物疏——遣策与西汉的丧葬礼仪[J].古代墓葬美术研究,2022,5:1-18.
TIAN Tian. From "clothing simplicity" to clothing sparseness: the sentence and the Funeral Rituals of the Western Han Dynasty[J]. Ancient Burial Art Research,2022,5:1-18.(in Chinese)
[14] 徐蕊. 从汉墓出土“遣策” 看西汉服饰[J]. 中原文物, 2010(5): 70-73.
XU Rui. Looking at the Western Han costume from the “dispatching policy” unearthed from the Han tomb[J]. Cultural Relics of Central China, 2010(5): 70-73.(in Chinese)
[15] 夏添. 先秦至汉代荆楚服饰考析[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2020.
[16] 许慎. 说文解字: 点校本[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2020:263-264.
[17] 段玉裁.说文解字注笺(第八上)[M].光绪二十年刻本.1900:87-88,95-96.
[18] 刘熙.释名:第八卷[M].北京:中华书局,2020:118.
[19] 郑玄. 礼记注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2021:360.
[20] 阮刻. 十三经注疏[M].影印本. 北京: 中华书局, 1980:1480.
[21] 中国大辞典编纂处. 汉语词典: 简本[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1957:614.
[22] 北京大学出土文献与古代文明研究所.北京大学藏秦简牍[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2023(4):635- 634.
[23] 睡虎地秦墓竹简整理小组. 睡虎地秦墓竹简[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1990:36.
[24] 史树青. 长沙仰天湖出土楚简研究[M]. 上海: 群联出版社, 1955:序.
[25] 米如田.“遣策”考辨[J].华夏考古,1991(3):96-99.
MI Rutian. The study of the "qiance"[J]. Chinese Archaeology,1991(3):96-99.(in Chinese)
[26] 彭浩.战国时期的遣策——简帛研究(二)[M].北京:法律出版社,1996:48.
[27] 王笑. “遣策” 的定名与分类[J]. 鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 39(4): 68-73.
WANG Xiao. Naming and classification of "qiance"[J]. Ludong University Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 39(4): 68-73.(in Chinese)
[28] 中山大学中文系古文字研究室楚简整理小组.战国楚竹简概述[J].中山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1978(4):62-71.
The Chu Jian Collation Group of the Ancient Writing Research Office, Department of Chinese Language and Culture, Sun Yat-sen University. Overview of the bamboo slips of the Warring States Chu [J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),1978(4):62-71.(in Chinese)
[29] 戴亚东. 长沙仰天湖第25号木槨墓[J]. 考古学报, 1957(2): 85-94, 118-123.
DAI Yadong. Muguo tomb No.25 in Yangtian Lake, Changsha[J]. The Chinese Journal of Archaeology, 1957(2): 85-94, 118-123.(in Chinese)
[30] 郭若愚.长沙仰天湖战圆竹简文字的摹写和考释[J].上海博物馆集刊,1986:21-34.
GUO Ruoyu. Copying and interpretation of the texts of bamboo slips from Yangtian Lake, Changsha[J]. Collection Shanghai Museum,1986:21-34.(in Chinese)
[31] 田河. 信阳长台关楚简遣策集释[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2004.
[32] 许道胜. 江陵望山楚简研究述评[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 19(5): 11-19.
XU Daosheng. A research review on bamboo slips from the tomb of Wangshan in Jiangling[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Social Science), 2005, 19(5): 11-19.(in Chinese)
[33] 程燕. 望山楚简文字研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2002.
[34] 张莹. 楚简遣册织品服饰类词汇研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2014.
[35] 王泽强. 战国秦汉竹简研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2003.
[36] 刘德银. 江陵扬家山135号秦墓发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1993(8): 1-11, 25, 99.
LIU Deyin. Brief report on excavation of Qin tomb at No.135 Yangjiashan, Jiangling[J]. Cultural Relics, 1993(8): 1-11, 25, 99.(in Chinese)
[37] 杨志飞. 试论秦墓出土遣策量少的原因[J]. 西安石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 19(1): 108-112.
YANG Zhifei. On the reasons of Qiance rarely found in Qin tombs[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Social Science Edition), 2010, 19(1): 108-112.(in Chinese)
[38] 杨志飞. 论秦简中遣策量少的原因[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2010.
[39] 龙仕平. 《睡虎地秦墓竹简》文字研究——以《说文解字》为主要参照系[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2010.
[40] 王辉, 王伟. 秦出土文献编年订补[M]. 西安: 三秦出版社, 2014.
[41] 靳阳春, 靳翠萍. 小议汉代服饰制度——兼辨“其断狱者印为章也”[J]. 江汉大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 21(4): 55-59.
JIN Yangchun, JIN Cuiping. On costume system in Han Dynasty—also comment on "judge’s stamp is seal"[J]. Journal of Jianghan University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2002, 21(4): 55-59.(in Chinese)
[42] 张如栩. 长沙马王堆三号汉墓遣策研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2011.
[43] 伊强. 谈《长沙马王堆二、三号汉墓》遣策释文和注释中存在的问题[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2005.
[44] 刘玉环. 长沙马王堆一号、三号汉墓遣策文字补释[J]. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016, 38(2): 14-18.
LIU Yuhuan. Supplementary explanation of the script of the first and third Han tombs in Mawangdui, Changsha[J]. Journal of Ningxia University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 38(2): 14-18.(in Chinese)
[45] 甘肃省文物考古研究所. 居延新简: 甲渠候官与第四燧[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1990.
[46] 谢桂华.居延汉简释文合校[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1987.
[47] 郑曙斌.长沙马王堆三号汉墓遣策简序复原研究[J].出土文献研究,2019:203-228.
ZHENG Shubin. Study on the restoration of the simple sequence of the dispatch policy in Changsha Mawangdui No. 3 Han tomb[J]. Research on Excavated Documents,2019:203-228.(in Chinese)
[48] 湖北省文物考古研究所. 江陵凤凰山西汉简牍[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2012.
[49] 章水根.江陵凤凰山汉墓简牍集释[D].长春:吉林大学,2013:39.
[50] 金立. 江陵凤凰山八号汉墓竹简试释[J]. 文物, 1976(6): 69-75, 102-103.
JIN Li. A trial interpretation of bamboo slips of Han tomb No.8 in Fenghuangshan, Jiangling[J]. Cultural Relics, 1976(6): 69-75, 102-103.(in Chinese)
[51] 彭浩. 凤凰山汉墓简牍[M]. 武汉: 湖北美术出版社, 2002.
[52] 武效青. 从凤凰山简牍看西汉初年江陵地区的社会生活[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2018.
[53] 黄盛璋.江陵凤凰山汉墓简牍及其在历史地理研究上的价值[J].文物,1974(6):66-77.
HUANG Shengzhang. The Han tomb simplified documents of Fenghuang Mountain in Jiangling and their value in the study of historical geography[J]. Cultural Relics,1974(6):66-77.(in Chinese)
[54] 张一诺.江陵凤凰山汉墓遣策集释(下)[D].北京:首都师范大学,2011:10.
[55] 武可荣,惠强,马振林,等.江苏连云港海州西汉墓发掘简报[J].文物, 2012(3): 4-17, 2-3, 97.
WU Kerong,HUI Qiang,MA Zhenlin, et al. Excavation of a western Han tomb in Haizhou, Lianyungang, Jiangsu[J]. Cultural Relics, 2012(3): 4-17, 2-3, 97.(in Chinese)
[56] 南波. 江苏连云港市海州西汉侍其繇墓[J]. 考古, 1975(3): 169-177, 202.
NAN Bo. Tomb of the western Han Dynasty in Haizhou, Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Archaeology, 1975(3): 169-177, 202.(in Chinese)
[57] 吴荭, 王永安, 张存良, 等. 甘肃玉门金鸡梁十六国墓葬发掘简报[J]. 文物, 2011(2):26-39.
WU Hong, WANG Yongan, ZHANG Cunliang, et al. Excavation of the Sixteen Kingdoms tombs in Jinjiliang, Yumen, Gansu[J]. Cultural Relics, 2011(2):26-39.(in Chinese)
[58] 赵国伶. 甘肃河西地区十六国时期衣物疏整理与研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2020.
[59] 金玉. 魏晋十六国时期河西服饰资料整理与研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2021.
[60] 宋少华,李鄂权.中国十年百大考古新发现(下册)“三次被盜掘的王后墓——长沙‘渔阳’墓”[M].北京:文物出版社,2002:484- 489.
[61] 湖南省博物院, 中国社会科学院考古研究所. 长沙马王堆二、三号汉墓发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1974(7): 39-48, 63, 95-111.
Hunan Museum,The Institute of Archaeology CASS.Brief report on excavation of Han tombs No.2 and No.3 in Mawangdui, Changsha[J]. Cultural Relics, 1974(7): 39-48, 63, 95-111.(in Chinese)
[62] 长江流域第二期文物考古工作人员训练班. 湖北江陵凤凰山西汉墓发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1974(6): 41- 61, 88-95.
The Second Training Course for Cultural Relics and Archaeologists in the Yangtze River Basin.Brief report on excavation of Han tomb in Fenghuang, Jiangling, Hubei Province[J]. Cultural Relics, 1974(6): 41- 61, 88-95.(in Chinese)
[63] 金立. 江陵凤凰山八号汉墓竹简试释[J]. 文物, 1976(6): 69-75, 102-103.
JIN Li. A trial interpretation of bamboo slips of Han tomb No.8 in Fenghuangshan, Jiangling[J]. Cultural Relics, 1976(6): 69-75, 102-103.(in Chinese)
[64] 孙晨阳, 张珂. 中国古代服饰辞典[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[65] 王聪. 《仪礼·聘礼》仪节复原研究[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2017.
[66] 陈军. 仪礼[M]. 合肥: 黄山书社, 2016.
[67] 杨天宇. 仪礼译注[M]. 新1版. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2004.
[68] 张亮. 周代聘礼研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013.
[69] 李志娜.《仪礼》郑注考[D].北京:北京语言大学,2011:75-76.
[70] 吕梁. 裼袭礼研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2019: 19-20.
[71] 王聪. 《仪礼·聘礼》仪节复原研究[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2017.
[72] 彭林. 仪礼全译[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1997.
[73] 李志娜.《仪礼》郑注考[D].北京: 北京语言大学,2011.
[74] 王锷. 三礼研究论著提要[M]. 兰州: 甘肃教育出版社, 2001.
[75] 陈直. 居延汉简研究[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2009.
[76] 陈直. 居延汉简概述[J]. 历史教学, 1962(4): 2- 4.
CHEN Zhi. Overview of Juyan Han bamboo slips[J]. History Teaching, 1962(4): 2- 4.(in Chinese)
[77] 陈公柔,徐苹芳.关于居延汉简的发现和研究[J].考古,1960(1):45-53.
CHEN Gongruo,XU Pingfang. On the discovery and study of the Juyen Han Jian[J]. Archaeology,1960(1):45-53.(in Chinese)
[78] 黄今言,陈晓鸣.汉朝边防军的规模及其养兵费用之探讨[J].中国经济史研究,1997(1):86-102.
HUANG Jinyan,CHEN Xiaoming. Discussion on the scale of border defence forces and the costs of maintaining them in the Han Dynasty[J]. Research on Chinese Economic History,1997(1):86-102.(in Chinese)
[79] 黄云眉.史学杂稿订存[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018.
[80] 丁凌华.中国丧服制度史[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
(责任编辑:卢 杰)

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-11