[1]高秀明.探析英国男装三件套的社会内涵[J].服装学报,2021,6(01):60-64.
　GAO Xiuming.Analyzing of the Social Connotation of Three-Piece Suit of British Menswear[J].Journal of Clothing Research,2021,6(01):60-64.
点击复制

探析英国男装三件套的社会内涵()
分享到：

《服装学报》[ISSN:2096-1928/CN:32-1864/TS]

卷:
第6卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
60-64
栏目:
服装历史与文化
出版日期:
2021-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analyzing of the Social Connotation of Three-Piece Suit of British Menswear
作者:
高秀明
扬州大学 美术与设计学院,江苏 扬州 225000
Author(s):
GAO Xiuming
School of Fine Arts and Design, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
分类号:
TS 941.7; TS 941.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
男性西装源自英国男装三件套。为探究西装成为全球男性受众最广和最正式服装的背景,从社会学角度进行分析:阐述了西装起源于1666年英国国王查尔斯二世时期,其实质是用非炫耀性消费模式取代炫耀性消费,达到政权合法性的目的; 引用“伟大的男性化放弃”概念,剖析了西装体现的社会平等价值观和男女性别差异; 用霸权式男性化的观点,阐明男性穿西装所象征的道德责任。研究认为,西装赋予的男性化基本特征是延续至今的稳定锚。研究结果为男性穿着西装提供文化参考。
Abstract:
Men’s suit,derived from the three-piece suit of british menswear in England, is the most formal and common of men’s clothing in the world. To explore the cause of the suit becoming the most popular and the most formal clothing for men in the world, this paper conducts analysis from the perspective of sociology. Firstly, it expounds that the suit originated from the British King Charles II in 1666, and its essence is to replace the conspicuous consumption with the inconspicuous consumption mode to achieve the purpose of political legitimacy; secondly, citing the concept of "great masculine renunciation ", the values of social equality embodied in the suit and the gender differences between men and women is analyzed; thirdly, from the perspective of hegemonic masculinity, this paper clarifies the moral responsibility symbolized by men wearing suits. According to the study, the basic characteristic of masculinity that suits impart is the stable anchor that perpetuates the suits to this day. The research provides a cultural reference for men who wear suits.

参考文献/References:

[1] MAZRUI A A. The robes of rebellion: sex, dress and politics in Africa [J].Encounter, 1970, 34(2): 19-30.
[2] HOLLANDER A. Sex and suits: the evolution of modern dress [M]. New York: Knopf, 1994.
[3] WAUGH N. The cut of men’s clothes 1600—1900[M]. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1964.
[4] KUCHTA D. The Three-piece suit and modern mascu-linity: England, 1550—1850[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
[5] FLÜGEL J C. The psychology of clothes[M]. London: Hogarth Press, 1930.
[6] EDWARDS T. Fashion in focus: concepts, practices and politics[M]. London: Routledge, 2011.
[7] CONNELL R W. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept[J]. Gender and Society, 2005, 19(6): 829-859.
[8] PRINGLE R. Masculinities, sport and power: a critical comparison of gramscian and foucauldian inspired theore-tical tools[J]. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 2005, 29(3): 256-278.
[9] UGOLINI L. Men and menswear: sartorial consumption in Britain 1880—1939[M]. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007.
[10] PETERSEN A R. Unmasking the masculine: men and identity in a sceptical age[M]. London: Sage, 1998.
[11] THORNTON M. Dissonance and distrust: women in the legal profession[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
[12] Reynaud E. Holy virility: the social construction of masculinity[M]. London: Pluto Press, 1983.
[13] Crane D. Fashion and its social agendas: class, gender, and identity in clothing[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press,2000.(责任编辑:邢宝妹)

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-11